However, I appreciate your honesty about considering it wrong to be voted at Best SpamBuster category. But I wrote that post as it intrigued me about who was igehhh talking about. As far as I see, none of the Top 3 made only 500-1000 reports...
Given the high level of copy and past voting going on, I took a look at the first page and saw two exact match votes with little spinning, 25-30mins apart, which I posted somewhere on this thread, but I'm too lazy to link it here. That being said, I'm enjoying the spam bursting category so far. And as for my report stats, I gave up a long time ago, because about 30+ cases are still unhandled, reporting in the gambling section is a headache, so I decided to make a list of spammers, remove the ones who improved after a few conversations, and send the rest to their campaign managers for evaluation, and the results have been good so far.my report stats isn't bad either. i cant compete with bot users. no way.
Anything over 16 and over 89% accuracy is of course a good stat 🤣
If I did, perhaps the person deserved to be in this conversation; there were so many igehhh tags in the comment that I could have misplaced some quotes; however, that's how my bot works, and I'm too old and busy to edit codes right now.
Of course, every single good post counts as a good stat, and you may be eligible to be voted on as the best scam buster.