I am not defending Fixed Float in any way and am strongly against the practice of selectively scamming clients by seizing funds for suspicion of money laundering.  Let us call it for what it is, seizing for this reason is most of the time used as a legal excuse for selective scamming.

On the other hand, if their Terms of Service mentions this then it is the customer's fault.

Interestingly, I moved tons of funds through some of these Exchanges and Fixed Float had the chance of freezing significant amounts from me before.  I successfully completed a few hundred transactions with them, using multiple identities.  They did not selectively scam me, although they had multiple chances.

I remember Fixed Float never had KYC or AML specified in their Terms.  Otherwise I am sure I would have not used it at all.

But truth is, most of these Exchanges have Anti Money Laundering procedures of some sort even if they are not mentioned and many of them seize your funds using the 'prohibited use' part of their Terms.  I have yet to see an Exchange mentioning they are NOT going to seize suspicious funds.

If they did specify AML in their Terms, then I am stupid myself for missing that part and trusting them with significant amounts.  If they did not, then scam (AML excused seizing) it is in my opinion.  But this is Fixed Float with the evil, not Best Change.

I find it weird these two Fixed Float reviews were posted the same day.  Maybe they started seizing funds more often recently, and only now we are starting to find out.  Anyway.  I think Best Change should place a warning on the Fixed Float page about them selectively seizing funds but if they delete Fixed Float from their website, then Best Change can also close their business as it is very true AML and KYC is almost everywhere nowadays.  But I can not go from here to blaming and accusing Best Change for intentionally keeping and collaborating with scam Exchanges.

-
Regards,
PrivacyG