That's exactly what an undercover state actor would say, though, right?
Besides; providing more info about themselves, how they are funded and whatnot, could dramatically increase their chance of getting busted like Tornado.

You presented CoinJoin as an alternative; how do you know the people running the coordinator aren't state actors? In case they make less money than ChipMixer and don't have the funds to finance a signature campaign, it could just mean it's an even better undercover operation, that is simply 'better disguised', no?
Especially if we have a look; one CoinJoin company is using blockchain analysis companies to sniff into its users' activities and potentially freezing their funds already. Doesn't it seem much more likely that these guys could be connected / pressured by / used by a government; instead of ChipMixer?

What I'm trying to say is: the whole argument / discussion is pointless. Waste of everyone's time, really. You can't prove or disprove any of this.

No need to apologize. On Bitcointalk everyone can share their opinion!
It's just.. Correlation doesn't prove causation and there can be alternative, equally as likely, explanations for all of the points you've raised. Which in my eyes, makes your 'theory' merely a relatively unfounded accusation.