With the rename to "Bitcoin Core", you would think it would be just that, the CORE p2p network/functionality.
IMO the foundation has no business competing with other clients and features, be responsible for the core, let others build on it.
At the very least separate out all "features" that are not required by the core as a separate application.
I'm not sure I follow you. In the post that you reply to, I talk about splitting off the wallet functionality. I don't see why you still feel that you need to rant. This can't be done in one day (unless we get a lot of knowledgeable new contributors), but it is the planned direction.
Re-reading my post, it does come off as a rant, that is not how it is intended....
I just believe that the "core" should be just that, the minimum code required to participate in and contribute to the network.
I think the planned direction to split out the wallet is great, and appreciate you taking it.