Dear all,
I'm sorry if I went awol but I was kinda depressed after Casinoguru's verdict.
I'd like to thank holydarkness for reporting the information and contacting stunna. I tried to reach him twice more than a month ago but I didn't hear back.
As holydarkness correctly stated, Casinoguru's verdict is indeed inconclusive.
But I think it's leaning on my side of things for two reasons:
1) the accusation of fake KYC was completely rejected and my documents were proven legitimate. I think this is not something that the community should dismiss easily. A casino going against a player and accusing him of providing false documents it's bad... They could have accused me out of sloppy checks or out of malice but, in either case, it's bad and speaks loudly about their trustworthiness.
2) casinoguru stated that the evidence provided by Stake "show that your account may be linked to multiple others". Emphasis on may. Meaning that their evidence is not conclusive, that they couldn't prove it beyond doubt.
They are also saying "we currently do not have enough insight into sports betting to be able to advise you correctly or make a well-informed decision about the usage of your account/sports platforms" which looks like a way to avoid telling if they have the right or not to seize your funds at the end. I'm sorry if I went awol but I was kinda depressed after Casinoguru's verdict.
I'd like to thank holydarkness for reporting the information and contacting stunna. I tried to reach him twice more than a month ago but I didn't hear back.
As holydarkness correctly stated, Casinoguru's verdict is indeed inconclusive.
But I think it's leaning on my side of things for two reasons:
1) the accusation of fake KYC was completely rejected and my documents were proven legitimate. I think this is not something that the community should dismiss easily. A casino going against a player and accusing him of providing false documents it's bad... They could have accused me out of sloppy checks or out of malice but, in either case, it's bad and speaks loudly about their trustworthiness.
2) casinoguru stated that the evidence provided by Stake "show that your account may be linked to multiple others". Emphasis on may. Meaning that their evidence is not conclusive, that they couldn't prove it beyond doubt.
Do you think they have only seized winnings or do you think they have also seized funds you have deposited ?
If one part comes from deposits at least it would be interesting to know what they will do with it now, because even if they've determined (wrongly or not) that you have one other account, it doesn't mean that these funds (legally and morally) belong to them.
Quote
When we assess multiple accounts cases, we look at how they may have been used to gain an unfair advantage over the casino. As you have only placed bets on sports, we currently do not have enough insight into sports betting to be able to advise you correctly or make a well-informed decision about the usage of your account/sports platforms.