I have taken those into account, and tried betting on the early ones, but I still don't see them as advantageous. In the examples I gave, you would need an entire "100%" of the odds to make up for that and while it definitely gives you a chance of getting higher odds, it's pretty unpredictable because it still relies on others betting. It's probably good for the underdog but I can't see how it's better for the favorite especially once you've missed the time weight multiplier.

Thanks for all your feedback, I am quite familiar with how it works here and still I am sharing my findings versus other places

I would like someone to prove that it is far more profitable with FUN, weight and all those calculations -- considering other places also give a lot more cashback and bonuses, I think it's just fair to use raw odds. A price boost on my other fav book is immediately 7% minimum boost on odds... 3x becomes 3.3x. I doubt the weight multiplier makes up for it as soslex points out (and again, it requires you bet very very early, so your money is locked for so long).