Hello everybody,
A few weeks ago I noticed that I had received a neutral tag, which I found strange at first, because I hadn't done anything about it.
When I went to check, I was somewhat perplexed, not realizing why:
When I read it, I thought about questioning it, but then I thought I'd better ignore it.
But, meanwhile, I was informed that the information contained in that tag may be limiting some bonuses in campaigns. Also the managers of SINBAD (my current campaign) are questioning the quality of my posts, because of this tag.
The reason for this tag, I still couldn't figure it out until today. Although the post that prompted this tag was deleted from the tag author's self-moderated thread, the post was commented on by other users and generated conversations appropriate to the topic of the thread.
In this sense, he decided to contact JollyGood via MP, requesting that he review the situation and the possibility of revising this tag. But only the answer, although polite, limited itself to saying that it would only review the situation in 8-12 months, and that this would not have an impact on the campaigns in which it participates (something that it is creating).
I always try to collaborate in the best possible way with the whole community and maintain a good relationship with everyone. And I never needed to make low quality posts to meet campaign objectives, making more than enough posts for the minimum requirements of the campaigns. So I feel a little wronged by this situation.
I would like to know if, among all the campaign managers I worked with and the rest of the community, if they think that my participations are of low value to justify such a tag?
Campaign managers I've worked with (I think that includes everyone...):
icopress / Hhampuz / CryptopreneurBrainboss / Royse777 / Joerii
Thank you for your attention and I appreciate any help you can provide on this topic.
A few weeks ago I noticed that I had received a neutral tag, which I found strange at first, because I hadn't done anything about it.
When I went to check, I was somewhat perplexed, not realizing why:
When I read it, I thought about questioning it, but then I thought I'd better ignore it.
But, meanwhile, I was informed that the information contained in that tag may be limiting some bonuses in campaigns. Also the managers of SINBAD (my current campaign) are questioning the quality of my posts, because of this tag.
The reason for this tag, I still couldn't figure it out until today. Although the post that prompted this tag was deleted from the tag author's self-moderated thread, the post was commented on by other users and generated conversations appropriate to the topic of the thread.
In this sense, he decided to contact JollyGood via MP, requesting that he review the situation and the possibility of revising this tag. But only the answer, although polite, limited itself to saying that it would only review the situation in 8-12 months, and that this would not have an impact on the campaigns in which it participates (something that it is creating).
I always try to collaborate in the best possible way with the whole community and maintain a good relationship with everyone. And I never needed to make low quality posts to meet campaign objectives, making more than enough posts for the minimum requirements of the campaigns. So I feel a little wronged by this situation.
I would like to know if, among all the campaign managers I worked with and the rest of the community, if they think that my participations are of low value to justify such a tag?
Campaign managers I've worked with (I think that includes everyone...):
icopress / Hhampuz / CryptopreneurBrainboss / Royse777 / Joerii
Thank you for your attention and I appreciate any help you can provide on this topic.