If Biden behaved adequately, then no one would talk about age even if he was 90 years old. But he often looks into the void, goes in an incomprehensible direction and behaves like an old man who is lost. At the same time, Trump is behaving very cheerfully. This difference has been noticeable to everyone in recent years, so part of the voters will not vote For someone, but rather Against the fact that a person with dementia is the president.
In general, it would be good (for American voters) if they had a wider choice, including younger candidates.
With ever passing day, Biden is resembling more and more like a walking corpse. There are conspiracy theories that claim that the original plan from the Democrats was to replace him mid-way through his term
with Kamala Harris. But that would be another disaster, given her radical left-wing agenda. For 2024, IMO it would be again Biden vs Trump. Kamala is still unpalatable for the vast majority of the independent voters. And by then Biden will be 81 years old and Trump would be 78 years old. I sincerely hope that the GOP would rather nominate Ron DeSantis.
It's good that in the United States the power is quite centralized and no madman, even if he became president, can break everything. Kamala Harris is rejected by the average voter not only because she is a leftist, but because she seems frankly dumb - she laughs dumbly at any questions and spouts some kind of nonsense. Even AOC looks like an intellectual against her background.
I really think that for now the government of the USA is in a certain normal degree, if in case Donald Trump wins again I don't know how much he would do, but I think it is not convenient for the world to do it, although there is the possibility that be the best mediator between the war in Russia and Ukraine, it can be a catalyst for many things that happen around the world and that cannot be channeled except with changes of government, in the case of Trump, he will change immigration policies again, eventually He will make it clear that he will make changes in his cabinet or in heads of authorities, and he would totally go nuclear.
if donaldo trump changed his stance on immigrants then he would gain more support from the people, also some other things he needs to change would be he distances himself a bit from white supremacists because that is creating a strain on the republican party, for example vice president of the party in the senate described trump's meeting with white supremacists as a ridiculous meeting, this is not a good trump move, I hope that his pre-campaign adviser can see that these moves are not good for his image, he needs to gain many allies and supporters and not have many enemies
Yes, it is that the trend that is taking place in the world is not just anything, since things that are so radical are not giving much result, politics must be much more open and have another direction, another criteria, have and accept more things, the voters who at one point supported Donald Trump made it clear to them that there were many things that he did not comply with, for whatever reason, but he did not do many things, what is clear to me is that he would not have allowed the fight or war between Ukraine and Russia, he has a lot of influence over Putin, and both have a lot of respect for each other, maybe that's why it's a good thing that didn't happen.
On the other hand, the treatment he gives to immigrants drives them away, and drives away many votes, especially now that so many have entered, perhaps Biden's policies don't help Trump shine so much.
1) 100% anonymous we are never going to ask you for any personal info or KYC BS it doesn't matter the amount
How are you going to operate legally then ? I mean whatever country you are registered at or want to operate in will require you to fulfill the KYC norms. How are you avoiding this ? Is the KYC later needed for like big withdrawals ?
Im also curious about this since they are providing 3rd party game provider. All license provider has a KYC policy for AML policy. Theres no way to operate fully anonymous on casino that is not decentralized.
Maybe they will not get license and will just add 3rd party games provider. A pros and cons when omitting the KYC part of the system.
Sometimes I don't turn on some platforms that say they don't ask for KYC, but in the same way they ask for it when the person is going to withdraw their funds, so this is something that can be taken as good or bad =? if they are still going to ask for KYC, then a player who plays with all his strength and wins, when he goes to withdraw he finds that pearl, it is something that causes a lot of annoyance, and anyone will not take it as good but quite the opposite I think these things shouldn't be done like that, if they don't require KYC it's because they shouldn't require KYC and even less so when money is withdrawn, because it's much more annoying, for that it's better that they say that for the Withdrawal of funds if that exists possibility if the casino deems it convenient.
We are never going to ask for KYC !
If you meet that expectation, I have nothing left but to congratulate you, because if you do or rather, if you do, I think that a lot of traffic will go to your casino, because anonymity is something that many players look for, and if they allow coins that they are not traceable would also be ideal, on the other hand, if they do not ask for KYC, also make sure that they have the licenses that allow them to be a legal platform and do not start attacking them there, because authenticity is something that is highly valued here , like all transactions are clear and there is no delay regarding withdrawals, because there is nothing worse than a player having his payment delayed for whatever reason.