It is no secret that FIFA is corrupt from top to bottom, but the fact that VAR is not used in this situation speaks volumes for the fact that Croatia had no chance in that match. According to all valid rules that apply in football, there is no question of a penalty kick but a foul on the goalkeeper - although most of you shit spammers have no idea what that means.
That penalty and an opening goal for Argentina changed the match. It's hard to say that if there is no penalty, will Argentina win the match. Maybe they will win it at the end too but we might feel doubtful that what will happen if they were not given that penalty. Will we see another drama from referee to give advantage to Argentina?Quote
"An important detail for which a penalty kick should not have been awarded: The goalkeeper's right foot is on the ground, and the contact is inevitable due to inertia. There is no foul, the contact was inevitable" - wrote on Twitter the Mexican with refereeing experience at the 2002 World Cup in South Korea and Japan, who currently works as a referee analyst for ESPN Deportes and ESPN Mexico.
Is it true like Zlatan Ibrahimovic said "This World Cup was reserved for Argentina and Messi". Believe it or not, soon we will know in the final match.
I get your point but at Majer's current age, Modric was already the Croatian best player twice. Honestly I don't think he could be as top as Modric someday.
I agree Majer does not have good talent and skills like Modric and he looked like too stressful and less confident in this World Cup.Majer did not show well with some substitutions in this World Cup. He and Modric are like Messi and Julian Alvarez as these young players used to consider Modric and Messi as their idols. In this World Cup, they have chances to play with their idols. Another one is Rodrygo and Neymar in Brazil squad.