It should be obvious that youre not trying to pass the copied text as your own original thought. The way users cite the source to their post, some insert the links in a dubious manner, you can tell they want readers to think they are the original authors by the way they hide the source link in the wall of text. Ratimov came up with some good examples of what should or should not be regarded as plagiarism and from the response of other community members it was clear where the line for plagiarism is drawn.
Should the link to the source be visible or should it be present? I also like LoyceV fifth option because it is more obvious that the OP isnt passing the work as his.
Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele made yet another bullish Bitcoin (BTC) prediction soon after the International Monetary Fund had urged his government to remove Bitcoins status as legal tender.
Bukele took to Twitter on Monday to predict that Bitcoin will ultimately see a gigantic price increase due to its limited supply of only 21 million digital coins.
The president cited Bitcoins scarcity case, emphasizing there are more than 50 million millionaires in the world, and there is not enough Bitcoin if each one of them wanted to own at least 1 BTC.