We could also argue that Argentinian goalkeeper didn't deserve a golden glove. Look at this comparison between Martinez and Livakovic:
So do you agree that Martinez deserved a golden glove reward as the best goalkeeper on the tournament?
This is an impressive stats for livakovic and i never knew he is this good. With this kind of stats i think he deserves the golden glove award but this reward is not only given to the player involved by his stats performance, i think the factor of where your team ended in the competition is also considered because in a situation where the goalkeeper who won the trophy contributed and perform very well in competition and is compared with another goal keeper whose stats is also impressive but didn't win the trophy, its only fair for the award to be given to the winner of the competition just like in the case between Livakovic and Martinez. So i think there is nothing wrong given the award to Martinez although Livakovic was impressive in his performance but for the fact that Martinez won the trophy, i think he deserves the award and glory.