If you look closely at the quoted monthly stats, there were an average of 50 active participation on the Nigeria board each month, and keep in mind that there are more new members who have yet to be added, and my reason is that I want to see how active they will stay on the thread and not someone who will just make a post and disappear. For the reasons stated on the Chart op, no newbies were added. A comparison should never be made in the first place. Creating a local board is more than just activities; many criteria must be met, and Nigeria has been without one for nearly two years. Nigeria is one of the top five countries in terms of crypto adoption. is also a big plus. It is unlikely that theymos will create a local board with 200+ pages for only 18 active members.
As I said, there are many factors to be taken into account when creating a new local board. And I think that the number of active users doesn't always mean that a local board is bigger than another. There are boards with few active users, but very relevant to the community. Others have many users, but have less relevance. It will always depend on how the analysis is done.
Perhaps for @theymos, the number of views of a local board/post is more relevant, which it can analyze in the forum's internal statistics, than the number of active users, to decide whether or not to create a new local board.
I do not believe that it is about views; a random piece of garbage can receive up to a million views with fewer than ten comments. Therefore, having a million views with less active members is not a good sign. The first important stage in obtaining a local board is the number of current members; you cannot award a local board based on its membership nine years ago or on the fact that it is the oldest and most popular board. com'on this is not Youtube

Perhaps for @theymos, the number of views of a local board/post is more relevant, which it can analyze in the forum's internal statistics, than the number of active users, to decide whether or not to create a new local board.
That was in my mind too, that's why in my first image I tried to highlight the number of views of Pakistan thread 2,590,488 vs Nigeria Thread 548,686.
We have 2.59 millions views vs 500k views, but unfortunately our Nigerian friends took it negatively and thought of it as a competition.
Comparing a view of a thread created in 2013 to a local thread created in 2019 seems absurd and useless, as it simply demonstrates the high activity on the Naija local board and the high decline in activity on the Pakistan thread.
Riding on Nigeria's success
Again please stop saying riding on the success of the Nigerian local board... Come on, that's so mean.
This is not how an official request should be written. This is more of a set of comparison graphs. Maybe you should look at how the Nigeria request was written and how we gained the forum's full support. When Nigeria got a local board, did you suddenly realize that Pakistan needed one?

well i support your request... my last post here.