seems you want to paint me as an idiot (which I probably am anyways.. at least in other regards), when I have not even stated anything disputable imo...
but you are welcome to have your way ...


For sake of communication what I wanted to say is:  

Like always in history, we have end-of-the-world sects.
Nowadays, at least one of them in the field of climate change.

They hold extreme views within the scientific climate debate that is supported by a variety of better or (more often) worse computer models..

The climate sects give themselves names like "Last Generation" and believe they are the chosen ones to save the world. They have their priest-like figures like that mentally instabile Greta girl

These apocalyptic sects' views are not(!) for debate, so logically they have to fight every counter argument and make excuses for anything that counters their view by default.

There are many researchers whose income depends on climate hysteria and they are incentivized to write paper after paper to drive a hysterical view forward.  

The debate is extremely politicized and the scientific field is flooded with billions of Dollars. It's obvious that a lot of junk science and junk papers are in circulation.


I have never stated that the climate doesn't change. But it is definitely used by politics in a big way.