[...]
holydarkness, you still haven't created a flag?
Was giving them a benefit of doubts and waiting for them to prove that they're legit by showing us their team, but their latest answer below clearly shows they're 100% entitled for doubt. Flag is now raised and updated on the opening post.
You can expect the second version of the whitepaper by the second week of January. As long as they will have LinkedIn links with real information, it's not a problem to use avatars I think. It does not mean we will use avatars but that's my own view. I can point you to more than 50 projects that have their team with avatars and/or with NO TEAM they rock for a long time (ie. PIVX).
Three weeks? By then, your token sale is already over, you expect people to invest on you first before you show any sign of what a legit project possess, e.g.: original WP clear or team details? And why would it need that long? I thought you didn't write your own WP and had to "resort to a freelancer" simply because English is not your native language, wouldn't that means you could just whip your already prepared draft and have someone to translate them for you in matter of hours?
And for NO TEAM that rock for a long time, can you please give us an example of one which also "outsourced" their WP and caught plagiarizes many materials?
A project who hired a content writer to write their document because "they-didn't-speak-English-although-their-replies-here-are-damn-near-perfect" --I'll pretend you did hire someone instead of caught red handed-- are questionable, a project that's also not bothering to spend several minutes to proofread their materials are double questionable and deserve a flag right away, but that's my owm view, and I tried to give you a benefit of doubt. But certainly we have to protect the benefits of many, i.e.: your future investors, especially as you planned to prove your legitimacy only after the token sale is long over. So,
in the name of Krampus and Ho-Ho-Ho, here's a flag, and a tag.