I don't think the world cup would be interesting like this. They should have just left it for just one country to host. Well, let's see how it goes. As for the the 48 teams instead of 32, I like it. It would make it possible for more countries to be part of the tournament. The world cup is always an interesting tournament no matter what but it's going to be really difficult to see a world cup more interesting than the one we just had in Qatar. I'm a big fan of the world cup and I always anticipate it. I hope the next one proves me wrong and becomes more interesting than that of Qatar.
I do had the same thought. Just for twenty matches adding two more countries isn't needed. Those 20 matches in Mexico and Canada isn't gonna make any big contribution to the nations. Qatar have done with perfection, but human lives lost during the process hasn't received proper compensation. Anyhow USA will try to make it better than the World Cup in Qatar. As one of the user mentioned the Visa process will surely be a hindrance for football fans around the world to reach USA for watching the matches.
Qatar hosted the World Cup in 2022 in a grand manner and spent a lot of money to build several stadiums suitable for the World Cup. It was decided to play the final at Lusa Stadium. But the next World Cup in 2026 would be best if the USA hosted the three countries. Because they can control themselves from the beginning to the end. But one thing that will become a problem is the visa. Football fans should have a little trouble with this one.