So, would such a campaign manager then base their conclusion on all neutral tags being for a wrongdoing? But of course, no. Screening hunters out based on neutral tag is a wrong call.
If the same neutral tag says that the user makes a low-quality post just to meet objectives, it can influence the campaign managers' choices.
Now the campaign manager must evaluate this in advance.
As well as the user will be able to question this tag in a sincere and honest way.
I think we can all make snap judgments, and things should be handled openly and logically.
And I think that despite this moment, of greater requests, JollyGood is able to manage and evaluate who should or should not get a response.
In general, I just think that each of us should avoid involving others in their disagreements among other users. This is an open forum, with thousands of people from different cultures, interests and backgrounds, who are entitled to different opinions.