How do you think I made a bet with boost in my previous accounts?  Neither Steve nor I said anything about it.  I have presented so much evidence and if you are an employee of sportsbet (as understood in your profile), I request you to clarify this situation by revealing my past bets of previous accounts.  As a sportsbet employee, it is unprofessional and unacceptable to say “no, you are not innocent”  by not provide any proof, and try to support your argument by just mentioning a user's message.  Your live support staff has made it clear (in the screenshots) that the boost is not a promotion or bonus, you can't just hide behind the odds boost being something in favor of the bettor. As a result, I did not abuse a promotion or bonus.  Moreover, boost is a feature that is used in 24 hours on every account.  I can't understand why Sportsbet excludes its own live support team from this issue, if you imply that what the live support team says is not reliable or if you find it unimportant why does this website have a live support team, is it a pawn used (in favor of the site) to deceive people at the end of the day?  (a pawn whose words you care about when it's in your favor, and you leave apart form the issue when it's against you).  Boost is a simple feature that comes to every account (as the live support team says), so I used this right when I opened an account.  Moreover, if I hadn't used odds increase in my bet, I would have been betting at odds of 9, which would have earned me $19683, there is no dramatic difference between this amount and the amount you have to pay me.

 All Steve told me was his disgusting accusations about me being a woman in the message you mentioned (I think you read it, but it doesn't seem like it) and a superficial accusation that I made multiple accounts because of the similarity of my emails.  In other words, I don't think that "he doesn't answer you because you use that bonus", "he doesn't answer because you use odds boost" as claimed by you or those who have spoken in this topic before.  In each of my proofs, this argument of yours evolves into something else strangely.  Steve needs to speak HIMSELF.  The prolongation of this issue is against sportsbet.io, and an authorized person (with their evidence, not with assumptions) should answer my evidences as soon as possible.