Bitcoin need not be an all or nothing proposition for individuals, institutions or countries, including in El Salvador bitcoin has been adopted as one of the currency options.
Yes it's another payment method that is legalized by the state, but how convenient is it for the population, namely for small and possibly medium-sized businesses? After all, now for them, payment for goods and services must be offered without fail to the consumer, since this is provided for by law. In this sense, everything was done a little wrong, because they don't do it by choice, but in a sense it is a mandatory measure. The business gets paid in bitcoin but the price of bitcoin is falling and this can be a problem for small businesses, this is an increase in risks...
You are talking gobbledy gook.
No company is forced to hold bitcoin, even if they are big enough to be able to process payments (including bitcoin payments), then they need to be able to accept bitcoin but they need not hold bitcoin beyond the transaction..they can convert it to dollars or they can do whatever they like with it.
The purported concern that you are raising about poor widdo businesses being forced to accept bitcoin (and your false assertion that they have to expose themselves to bitcoin's relative volatility), is largely a nothing burger... so let's see how these matters play out for the country, for the people and for the various institutions who choose to operate in bitcoin... who choose to figure out some various ways to get involved in bitcoin and perhaps even to retain some of their value in bitcoin.
For sure, one of the great things about El Salvador in terms of being a sovereign nation is that they are providing options for their citizens that seem to NOT be available in a lot of other locations (or at least not so clearly asserted as being options) - even thought it is also likely that some countries (and even smaller subnational locations) are opening themselves to bitcoin and using aspects of El Salvador as a model regarding various bitcoin-related programs that they might implement and various kinds of bitcoin-related transactional options that they may well be opening up to their citizens and businesses that operate therein. I have not heard of any location making it mandatory to have to hold bitcoin, and surely there might be more and more forcing of businesses in the future in terms of making sure that they retain and maintain options for customers to send them bitcoin.. but again, those kinds of measures still seem to be early and so far not really being enforced, even though some enforcement in that direction would be potentially within options that governmental institutions would have... and hardly seems oppressive in the whole scheme of current status of bitcoin in terms of its so far relatively low adoption levels, even while awareness of bitcoin continues to grow.