I am torn on this because I would have been careful NOT to share information while the attack is going on and things like that, and then being publicly known makes it seem as if even additional precautions might be needed.
Signed,
truly torn.
He brought it up.
If he didn't want to talk about it then he shouldn't have tweeted about it for the whole goddamn world to see.
He answered, actually:
https://twitter.com/LukeDashjr/status/1609868077146972160A lot of this is weird because some folks were claiming that we were likely being played because some of the mistakes seem so dumb.. and I recall how so many folks asserted that Luke did not have hardly any coins.. and so he needed funding and blah blah blah.. and I suppose that if he had a couple hundred coins, then maybe he was largely going along with those pleas of poverty from a few years ago, because there may well have been some needs that his development efforts should be funded... and no one should really have to work for free if they seem to be providing quite a bit of value to the space.. so the balancing of funding and even abilities of developers to be able to get paid enough to live are not easy to figure out within these kinds of open source movements, ie. bitcoin..
Top Bitcoin Owner Country:
Thailand Bitcoin Owner: 20.1%
Nigeria Bitcoin Owner: 19.4%
Philippines Bitcoin Owner: 19.4%
Turkey Bitcoin Owner: 18.6%
Argentina Bitcoin Owner: 18.5%
Indonesia Bitcoin Owner: 16.4%
Brazil Bitcoin Owner: 16.1%
Singapore Bitcoin Owner: 15.6%
South Korea Bitcoin Owner: 13.4%
Malaysia Bitcoin Owner: 13.2%
Source? Did you just make that shit up? And what are the "ownership criteria?" 1 satoshi? or some other threshold?