The feedback is not solely made on the case of Laki21000, it also reflected on how they addressed the situation for accusations raised against them in general ~snip~
why do you think it'll be good and safe to remove the negative and turn into neutral if they didn't show any good gesture or any sliver of professionalism?
Although I haven't made any post here while the main discussion was going on, but I was following this accusation from the initial stage. I know that TrustDice team didn't show the professionalism here to solve the problem. They only did it after getting pressure from the forum members. It has created a bad impression in the forum about TrustDice services.
@Pmalek and you have left negative feedback with the reference of this solved accusation. OP has added 'solved' in this thread title. TrustDice team behavior was obviously wrong, but negative feedback doesn't fit with a solved accusation. Neutral feedback with a proper comment will work as a warning as well.
Poika5's accusation is still unresolved. TrustDice representative hasn't provided any proof there. It would be reasonable to leave negative feedback on TrustDice representative account based on that accusation. Crypto casino rarely post the evidence of multi accounting in a public forum. Sportsbet has done it in the accusation which you have mentioned above. TrustDice team should post the proof here as they have made their reputation questionable by making false claim against 'Laki21000'.