And yes, some of these single aspects can be labelled as "anarchist" or "libertarian" etc. but for (most likely) everything I can argue for the exact opposite.
Lets take "anarchist", implying that means "unchained". At the same time, Bitcoin is completely the opposite of "anarchist" because Bitcoin is indeed following the same rules- for everyone. The rules are defined in the code.
Bitcoin is "unchained money" and "coded Blockchain money" at the same time.
"anarchist" can also mean disruptive. which bitcoin is disrupting and offering a new choice to hedge against fiat wallstreet game of fiat monetary policy/control
..
bitcoin does not fit the old terms of fiat categories of "currency" nor the terms of fiat based communities
but if you were to draw it out on a heat map of position closest to certain labels
authoritarian
/ \
/
$ \
/ \
capitalist libertarian
\ /
\
BTC /
\ /
socialist