I totally agree on this, It is certainly true that traditional banks offer a level of security and convenience for customers in terms of storing and protecting their deposits. Customers do not need to worry about the technicalities of securing their funds, as the bank takes on this responsibility.
On the other hand, with a digital currency like bitcoin, the individual is responsible for the security and storage of their funds. This can be a daunting task for those who are not very into tech world or who do not want to take on the responsibility of managing their own security. Therefore, it is understandable that some people may prefer the convenience and security offered by traditional banks over the added responsibility and potential risks of self-management with digital currencies.
The pros of a situation are always balanced by the cons. In the end, It is all a matter of perspective I guess.
It is very extraordinary understanding that you express here so I also have to agree with what you say. Because the pros and cons are always there and will always be born in the end caused by each person's perspective. For now I still use traditional bank services to save some of my money and I keep some of it myself in the form of digital currency. I do this because I still need the bank and its convenience in saving money and it also doesn't make it difficult for me when I need money as soon as possible.
Another repository in digital form I do is to trade and also invest when there is a good moment to enter the market or when I want to try to get a better profit, although I don't put all of it into it right away. Because I always save half of the assets that I want to use for anything. That is why I still use the two depository models until now and will still use traditional bank services as long as they are very helpful to me as a customer.