i dont know where you keep following them ~
The first and third accusation is almost same. Perhaps, both of those accusations have been made by the same person. Maybe it's you, because you are trying to highlight those old topics here to create pressure on Duckdice team. You have also bumped the old topic. The second accusation has been resolved (his withdrawal has been processed). You may follow this thread if you have doubt about Duckdice reputation:
Duckdice Reputation ThreadI also have the impression that for several days someone has been trying to attack Duckdice in various ways.
There have been several answers to this case already, this is the last one:
This will be my final comment on the matter:
1. OP isn't able to provide any proof that the account belongs to him, no previous IP, no previous wallet addresses used, he can not even name the email address being used with the account !!!
2. He also claimed that his access to the account was lost due to the fact of having his phone "stolen" , The account OP is trying to claim has never been accesed via phone mobile !!!
3. Igumama or richardo or crewchellenge or Nomercy or whatever new Bitcointalk alt you're going around these days, judging by your way of going around things, on Bitcointalk and off, as a previous user mentioned in this thread ( thank you for making the connection), we will not humour you anymore in this matter, regardless of the amount of fake reviews you put out right now on Bitcointalk or TrustPilot.
Duckdice Support,
This case is also explained - it is enough to read the thread. Did you do that?
This case is from November 2021 and person that created this thread have been active here just an hour without any proofs:
Date Registered: November 16, 2021, 03:53:38 AM
Last Active: November 16, 2021, 04:55:07 AM
I understand that you may be somewhat dissatisfied with the use of Duckdice, but what you are doing is more manipulation than a genuine desire to demonstrate the truth about the casino.
Ps. Sorry if this is off top but I thought it should be clarified.
I strongly believe that Memo101 is aswell igumama, richardo and various other bitcointalk newbie accounts. Igumama recently started a manipulation thread trying to take over a high roller inactive duckdice accounts ( basically he's been trying this in the past aswell, he tries to take over abbandoned accounts then proceeds to ask for benefits, something along the lines " I have wagered, lost a lot on your casino in the past, please give me bonus). He couldn't provide any proof whatsoever of owning the account, which we obviously denied him , and his usual mode of operation as in the past is 1. create a story to gain simpathy from the community, 2. Revive inactive threads on bitcointalk ( mostly started from his alt accounts) that were "dead" for 1-2 years, 3. Proceed in spamming our trustpilot page with fake reviews, while it seems trustpilot is flagging his multiple accounts/fake reviews and removes them, it's not happening as fast as we'd like, though it's quite funny to see the similar posts with identical spelling mistakes, and getting 5-10 negative reviews in a few hours.
While I have no concrete evidence that he's behind all these bitcointalk accounts ( I'm sure an moderator/admin would be able to link the accounts via ip/device) this smear campaign basically started a few days/week since Igumama came up with his new story.
So I really appreciate all the people here actually looking into it and not jumping on the "lets bash them bandwagon", as I wasn't even aware of this thread until checking "Memo101"'s recent posts as I saw he re-vived a dead 1 year thread.
If there are ever any clarifications needed I'm also available via pm in case new allegations pop-up.
Duckdice Support.