I think many casinos still allow their users to play gambling without doing KYC and I think casinos have restrictions for gamblers before they do KYC.
You don't need to use a lot of money to avoid KYC even though later the casino will ask you to do KYC.
So as long as you don't use big money and don't withdraw too big winnings, I don't think the casino will ask you to do KYC.
We must limit the use of playing gambling in any casino, especially if we don't want to do KYC.
One shouldn't win big, really! Because of KYC?
At times, we paint KYC as though its a foe. It's a want not to do by most individuals and am not excluding myself on this but, making it a reason not to win big if you can don't feel like the answer to staying off KYC to me. Let's not forget, some casinos could randomly request users for KYC and then what, you run away to sme other casino or open yet another account? That's even inviting more trouble.
KYC is an issue in the crypto space and beyond, yes! That only becomes a reason to worry whe it's in the wrong hands and not being able to tell whom or where is the safe hands becomes the more worrisome.
In many countries casino informs tax inspections about big winnings. Nobody wants to pay taxes from his winnings.
Also it is necessary for users to be sure that the personal data of users are kept in a safe plays.
Do they really do that?
I have a different idea as to how these tax inspectors could get tips of what is. Of course it involves the casinos as well but, not directly sending any information to the inspectors.
You know sometimes these big wins are a vital part of there advertisement. Especially as a prove that they are capable to pay and its possible to win big. Now putting this information out indirectly lands the info on the tax office's desk.