Implying that real estate is as easy to acquire as crypto and the aforementioned assets and commodities. Just because it is intangible, which is what most of you guys argue for stocks, bonds, and crypto, doesn't necessarily mean it is of no value. For all I know, the housing bubble is about to pop soon enough courtesy of the housing scandal in China and the ever-soaring prices of land thanks to greedy landlords who think of renters as cash cows to sustain themselves with instead of human beings who they got a mutual favor from. I'd like to know what OP's gonna feel once that comes around.
How to define property? Property already includes material wealth such as your money, house, supplies, land you own, etc. So how do you prove that your property is yours?
When people invest, they will first choose to invest in real estate and stocks. Because that's what the public knows. Of course, some people will choose cryptocurrency, but novices will not choose cryptocurrency at the beginning. He needs market experience.
Since it is property, I think it is safe in my own hands, and I don't trust any organization.
Lmao true, and don't get me started with "the bank said it's mine after I signed a mortgage so it must be true" logic. Although I would argue about the relative "diffivulty of handling each and every asset you mentioned. I would also agree with the fact that real estate is the easiest asset to invest upon. As it stands today you can watch your money grow literally as real estate isn't showing apparent signs of depreciating in value, which could change given ny statement above regarding China's housing dilenma which could translate to the western hemisphere.