It was added to the winner's amount? (I don't know for sure).
Prize 0.00026254 BTC
bc1qvcngzn85l9gzyq0qmjmlp883rs46tyupftd82u 0.00000300 BTC
bc1qtltta3s20xxa8de6pu8cg92c9zqvcnhs3hxztr 0.00000400 BTC
bc1qz9y5pmj7690az9m3y2qvus7r0rw8z4y4f4kfpx 0.00000800 BTC
bc1qxs0277ethjj2zrkwutkx2qj5lgfv67tkujwqly 0.00000800 BTC
bc1qktnqq0x8phnks7swtpch9gjm863k0q28z47g56 0.00004063 BTC
bc1q5gz6c5u3c8p6e6mtgnq0gxre9mkrgvav3n0q4g 0.00004779 BTC
bc1ql847ly3a0kaw6zhscc686a3lv7ve98qgay8422 0.00004780 BTC
That would result in: 0.0001+0.98*(0.00000300+0.00000400+0.00000800+0.00000800+0.00004063+0.00004779+0.00004780)=0.00025603 BTC.
If you add 98% of my missing 0.00000666 BTC deposit, you'll get the correct Prize.
It has increased the "ending time" with 140+ blocks?
I checked, and that's correct. My second deposit confirmed in
block 770,934.
BitcoinGirl.Club's deposit confirmed in
block 770,915 and the prize was sent in
block 771,085.
That leaves 151 blocks after my deposit, it looks like the auction was extended by 144 blocks after my deposit. I guess the transaction was sent 5 confirmations later.
This means that it was seen as a smaller (non-winning) separate bid, no matter the originating address.
There's still a flaw: my bid never showed up in the list of Participant payout addresses.
So it can be "the expected behavior", just it must be documented.
Definitely. I think the game is more fun if you can increase your bid though. Let's say you bid 1 Bitcoin, and the Prize is at 4 Bitcoin. If you'd have to bid 1.1 Bitcoin to increase your prize, you're less likely to do so than when you need to send "only" 0.1 Bitcoin.