I created a new wallet for these campaigns since the previous Electrum wallet I had was not segwit, it's a legacy wallet, eats more fees.
For the last six months, in the mempool, I see approximately the same information about transaction fees, so I'm not sure that we are talking about big savings. In addition, when processing weekly payments, I very often manually significantly increase transaction costs so that users can immediately manage their funds.
How is it going to resolve the problem? Because of the tag you left, many campaign mangers will deny him joining their campaign, companies will deny him to give their projects, resulting he is not going to financially benefit from the forum. As per his explanation the forum is his only earning source. sucks but it's reality for him.
It's a delusion. I, like other managers, have repeatedly accepted users with red tags into the campaign, especially when the user has more green tags than red tags (we are not talking about tags associated with outright fraud). No self-respecting manager will remove high quality posters from a campaign just because they got a red tag, this rule is more like a deterrent factor for those accounts that generate spam (as far as I remember, you also participated in the signature campaign when you had a red tag ). As for me, I will immediately remove my red tag as soon as one of the members of the DT tags julerz12, because I do not think that a dozen tags will help the case.