Let's not get too much into semantics. I am sure that all understood the message of this thread. Looking for small mistakes is typically human, yet this is not the point -- debunking sentence by sentence. I could also argue and say the even during Industrial Revolution there were victims -- but it would be pointless... The important part is what Satoshi achieved and where Bitcoin led us in the past decade...
Agreed. I think bloodless is plain and simple: without causing directly the death of other through violence.
If we want to argue, every single development, progress, passage of time has victims either through intended or unforeseen circumstance. The way the world is so connected now, I fear every single item I buy has a chain of victims behind it, and ahead of it.
Bitcoin has always forged a path that doesn't require force.