but it would be better if the campaign was continued to build good trust than before. so there is no doubt from the gamblers here.
Signature campaigns mostly help with exposure and maybe bring in new customers, it has nothing with building trust. What the service delivers is what builds trust. There can be several reasons as to why certain service stop signature campaigns, as already mentioned by some members.
But to be honest, according to my observation, casinos or services that run long term campaigns are the ones to seem to thrive more rather than those to keep starting up short campaigns. Once you introduce lets say a 2 months campaign, you get known in those two months after which signatures are removed and next thing that happens is people forget that the service even exists
I have already forgotten that Betfury is still in the forum because their campaign is not in the active part. Yes if the signature campaign is still available or running in the forum the awareness would have increased. Even the newbies would have known that such casino does exist in the casino space. Campaign is one of the best way to attract customers to the casino website.
I will agree with logfiles that signature campaign has nothing to do with the casino's reputation. The way the casino attends to it customers will determine the reputation of the casino. But campaign also help on the popularity of the casino in the forum
What happened to the loyal followers of Betfury by the way? If they are so Loyal I t think they should keep the signatures especially if they are staking thier BFGs in the casino.
They are going to keep sending dividends to the holders while paying the campaigns also. The signature campaign will help the promotion but it's also going to drain the funds of the team. Maybe they could do campaigns to low-rank users, less fee but will still have requirements to be visible in the gambling forum.