Re: Royse777 is a dishonest person and thus my negative feedback
I would have liked to put this subject to rest a long time ago, but since Royse777 doesn't stop crying and some people don't seem to know what happened
That is quite an extensive list, very detailed and it must have taken time to compile therefore your efforts have to be noted.Initially I thought about staying out of this thread because it is not been self-moderated and eventually it will be overrun with walls of text especially when Royse777 gets in to defensive mode and couple of hangers-on will come to back her up but at least you made a reference for your feedback/trust and rational therefore members can read it if they are interested.
I disagree with some of your comments, it is not important to explain where but in the general aspect you seem to have matters mostly correct as far as I can recall.
If anyone is wondering what happened in bitlucy then this is my side of story:
Royse777, Bitlucy and long story in brief
I paid over $6,000 cash, out of my own pocket for the mistake I made.
Who actually believes this?Royse777, Bitlucy and long story in brief
I paid over $6,000 cash, out of my own pocket for the mistake I made.
Who believes Royse777 paid over $6000 from their own pocket for the mistake she made and what evidence has been shown to back up that claim?
Does anybody know what the mistake was that she made?
I even saw a forum member repeat this claim as though it was a matter of fact. Where is the evidence $6000 was paid by Royse777 and to whom was it paid. Is there any actual link to an actual post (rather than a link to a thread OP) that can be seen to show blockchain evidence?
As far as I recall, the few complaints that were made in the forum did not any of the funds they were scammed out of. In one case an alleged threat was made against members involved in the Royse777/Bitlucy scam which was cited by Royse777 as an excuse to not pay losses even though she said she would pay out from her own pocket. Does anybody remember Royse777 wanting KYC from a victim before paying for their losses even though Bitlucy had already exit scammed?
My actions should speak for me, not the words.
The problem is your words which come secondary to your actions. When you do not get your way you cannot even handle a decent debate without getting extremely agitated and aggressive. Thank you poker player to give me the opportunity to leave an executive report of the work I do while you are busy spreading hate against me. See you some day seeking a position in one of my campaign.
Such arrogance with an overinflated ego. Why could you not start the new year off with a change in attitude and be more approachable and respectful 
I don't 100% agree with negative feedback for Royse777 (though he was definitely evasive about his role in the Casino Critique case), but I don't think Poker Player leaving a neg or starting up this thread constitutes abuse, either. On the other hand, I think everyone who's already familiar with the issues he brought up has already made their judgement and justifying the negative feedback in this way is unnecessary.
These are kind of old issues at this point, no?
You are right if I read correctly, these are old issues but have now have a singular reference point compiled. Like you I do not see abuse here because a reference has been compiled.These are kind of old issues at this point, no?