I was wrong about the rule change. I got mixed up so that's on me and I apologize.

I actually have made deposits and lost hundreds of dollars.

Honestly this current system would only work if there were at least 25% of every 100 members making deposits. I'm not talking about 100 deposits, I'm talking about the number of members needed to keep depositing to prevent timeout. There simply aren't enough people actively depositing to have a round timeout after 24 hours. I only count 10 unique deposit addresses on this current round...For example: if you have the current unique 10 depositors and have 100 members registered, that means only 10% of people are actually using the system. With that number of people having rounds time out after 24 hours is just bullshit. You get one guy that deposits .5 twice and then one guy comes behind and deposits .1 then no new payments....the guy who put 1 btc in is screwed. The max/min ratio is the problem. Let me put it this way: if someone who understands how this works only has .1 btc to put in and sees that current payouts require 1 bitcoin in deposits to complete that means they're just not going to bother depositing. The maximum depositors are hurt by the minimum depositors and the minimum depositors are hurt by the maximum depositors. The higher the gap between MIN/MAX deposits the more screwed up the system gets. If they were more even you'd have more deposits because the risk for people using it would be lower. Even out the min/max and prolong the round timeout until more people get involved.