What kind of justice do you mean, what is warning: Trust which exists, not enough according to you, I often see several Bounty campaign managers who get warnings from DT, but are still running campaigns, but the bounty hunters still participate in the campaign, in fact they know the risks, is it not a problem, why don't the bounty hunters assess it.

In my opinion, in cases like this, those who should be blamed and warned are the owners of certain companies, which are banned because of plagiarism.
To be more fair, if managers don't pay tokens to bounty hunters, after tokens are distributed to managers they don't distribute to bounty hunters, maybe it's worth warning with red paint, because managers are cheating campaign participants.

I think if @Royse77 is responsible for bounty hunter in terms of token/distributing not one real justice to mark it, Who owns a company that must be tried in this case, besides they / the owner has been tried here.
Is I say fair enough in your opinion or vice versa.