Another fact is that you know nothing about Bitcoin and any other cryptocurrency, and if you love pi network crap so much than use your ''analyse'' for pi newtork not for bitcoin.
I doubt even a single person from forum ever paid a cent for your magical ''analyse'' of anything.
Excepting saxydev's
precious piece of shit
analysis analyse, another argument for the possibility of him being a scammer can be found by browsing his topics. His topics, not his posts! And, by looking at the topics he started, we can see names as:
Information about cyprus banks -- here he was looking for advice on how to move 200.000 euro from a Moldavia bank to an Italian one. I wonder how could this pauper make 200.000 euro...
Looking for information about ransom attacksLooking for a paper -- here he was looking for a paper (?!) -- "I am looking for this paper: Discerning payment patterns in Bitcoin from ransomware attacks"
Interested in finding the real owner of a btc address - 40$ XMR -- "Please don't make it public, sensitive matter (not personal)."
Looking for hacks on the TRX network, stolen funds on TRONAnd the list goes on. Furthermore, inside each topic he offered a shitty amount of money (5$ - 10$) for those giving him good information. For me,
it seems like saxydevs tries to learn as much as he can from previous scams and then try to repeat them.
Maybe the topic which shows the most his scammy character is this:
Maybe some hacks should not be illegal.
Why stealing btc from someone's private key is seen as malicious?
Seriously? What honest person would ask this?
Besides, one reply says things bluntly:
Why stealing btc from someone's private key is seen as malicious?
In this question, you question stealing right?
What else can be thought about someone asking such questions?
Dude, there is not such a service for free anywhere. What are you even talking about? You can try a lifetime pointing me to a free service. There is none.
dkbit98, for the sake of the argument, if you manage to find some free time, give this moron some examples, to prove him that he is both a liar and an imbecile.