Been using his services for the last 2-3 years, ordered multiple cards (3 cards). Suddenly, during new year time (everyone needs extra cash), one of the card stopped working, as soon as it has received a transfer from the exchange. He claimed that one of the transactions from a year ago, to another card, has initiated "an international police order". No proofs, nothing, just steal our funds. Over a month of chats and now he is threatening to expose our details if we don't pay " the lawyer and the nominee compensation fee of 3500 EUR" He steal around 1700 Eur from us.
The transaction in question represent less than 0.25% of the total turnover during our cooperation with him, so you can understand that even if it is true, this was a coincidence and came from one of the exchanges we have used. I doubt this is true though, as no proofs has been presented.
I suggest anyone, who is thinking about the privacy and security (not to mention security of their funds) not to deal with this scumbag.
Happy to provide any details to the admins.
last messages:
"Hello, hope you had a nice holidays.
The nominee had a meeting with the lawyer. In one's turn the lawyer also had a chance to get familiar with the details of the international police order.
The nominee will claim that card and sim have been lost, it was long ago, he does not remember anything etc. He will make the most effort to stall the whole case and make it a dead end. This is the optimal solution in this situation.This whole situation certainly creates an enormous risk for the nominee. To cover the lawyer and the nominee compensation there will be a 3500 EUR fee, 1700 can be covered from the Santander balance (you have claimed this amount as I remember)."
"Hello.
You have not replied anything for more than a week now. I assume we will have to cover everything from our pocket then.
Therefore letting you know that during all the possible interrogations the nominee will act at his interest and will take the most effort to shift the suspicions towards the place where the usage of the card actually took place when the problem transaction ocurred."
"