These are the people who devote their time and efforts to make some personal research about members and their post over here, if they noticed you aren't honest it may warrants of giving bad feedback this doesn't mean they should get ban for no reason. And besides you should be the one to get ban if you may know, from your trust rating. jollygood is a reputable member who love digging into details about someone presentation to be either true or false. And if False then he will make it clear to you to show evidence of what you claimed of, If there is no clear evidence provided then he may leave a redtag on you.
These are the people that can't read, same as you. I have never been dishonest, so he has no proof. The guy is a first class idiot. I changed all of my feedback to an accurate thing and added some.
I think It will be better I totally ignore you because I don't see any reason to reply here anymore.
Now I see why you were being tagged.
Do you understand I don't need to provide proof? That I have the benefit of the doubt? That those users first need to come with proof?
Can you please get that? Instead of just defending the guys making the false accusations?
You are the one who came here and claimed that 1xbit paid you 10 BTC, therefore burden of proof is on you. After you failed to do that, you got negative feedback.
People around here are especially sensitive when it comes to 1xbit because they are regularly scamming people and using paid shillers, so when a member like you with no reputation here says something like that, people will ask for proof.
On his other thread, I ask him to sign the wallet where he was supposed to receive the 10 BTC from 1xbit because in the past we have seen how people shill this scam casino by posting that they received or won from 1xbit, people could not just believe that a casino with dubious reputation will send 10 BTC to one of their players, so failing to prove will result in getting you negative feedback.
Unfortunately, your wish will not be granted because you have a very poor reason, and sending negative feedback will not constitute banning, you have a lost cause on this one.
BOTH OF YOU IDIOTS SHOULD GO TO THE THREAD AND READ WHAT I SAID.
I have just proven that I have the ownership of the address. I announced an action by that address before it was confirmed on the blockchain, you can verify through time stamps.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5436623.new#newANd I remain with this: there is no need that I need to provide evidence but dealing with a bunch of monkeys like you I succumbed. If you call me arrogant fine, I am not shilling, I am not scamming. I know one other thing you guys are dumb!