Somehow this whole situation seems like OP and saxydev have a beef and OP has simply managed to raise a mob due to his bitcointalk influence.

Yes this is an alt account ( from what I'm seing having a beef with GazetaBitcoin is enough enough to be marked as a scammer and Trust to be nuked), no I am not saxydev, though I am from the same region as him and OP so I did follow their beef in the regional threads aswell, here's my 2 cents though:

Saxydevs aml service:   While it's unethical ( assuming he has access to some free tools which are probably available to anyone with a thorough search on the internet) how does it actually qualify as a scam ?  Unethical sure, as he's charging for it, but then again seems like one of those scenarios where people download a free e-book, no copyrightes attached and sell them to others.

Saxydevs shill of Pi token: A shit coin ? 100%.  Turned out to be a scam ? Nope, simply a shitcoin that people have been "mining" with their phones for years, remember the ads about it for years now, looked recently into it as I've "mined" about 300 of those, which apparently are trading OTC at this point.

Regarding the Flag, it seems that while he initially said yes, after 20 minutes he went back on it, and said "no deal", so how exactly does that constitute as a broken contract when the other party of the "agreement" didn't come forward between those 20 minutes.

Are you basically saying that for example, I decided to buy a car, I call the dealership and tell them I'll buy X car, then I change my mind call them back and say I won't anymore, that I'm liable for it? That I've broken a contract and the dealership expects me to pay the amount regardless?


Now regarding GazetaBitcoin, I've honestly always considered you to be one of the highest standing members of the bitcointalk community (at least in the Romanian section) and have always followed your articles/interviews, and honestly this is simply dissapointing, you've established an online image here, and presence, and honestly you should do better!  Saying things like " Based on his IQ, which is a number lower than the one of his shoe size"   or "He just writes idiotic stuff and, together with his level of very low education reminds me a lot of another Romanian imbecile".  

While you ended your OP with:  Although I have no clear evidence that he is a scammer, you also stated in the same OP "the scammer is willing to make deals only through PMs or Discord, not in plain sight." or "the scammer alleges that he has thousands of BTC, ETH and TRX addresses"  so which is it, wasn't the Scam Accusations thread supposed to be a place for actual scams !? Isn't the whole format there for a reason?  Amount Scammed, Payment Option, Proof of payment, Pm, Chat logs? Why isn't this thread in the Reputation sector of the forum, where you could have actually made a case regarding this, supposedly without the "low iq, low education" and actually do a proper analisys as you're well known for on this forum? Why did you go about it as an angry middle schooler?

Most dissapointing aspect, why did most of the higher trusted members participating in this thread didn't call out OP on this, is this how the Trust system should work? How the flag system is intended to work?  Why did no one other than Loyce question it?.

OP: You might want to reconsider your standing and general image when you feel it's appropiate to call someone "a very low level of education" and "low iq". Since you are/were one of the most respected members here, you should do better!



P.S. - Yes I do expect to be considered saxydev's alt account due to not following the general mindset on this thread, I do believe saxydev's oppinions on segwit are dog poop, same as his belief in PI token,  and yes I also believe that this was massively mishandled by GazetaBitcoin and most of the people on this thread.  And yes, I am expecting to be blasted with red trust for it.