Cardano is a good technology as well but I think ETH will remain the first option of many and will stay as the top altcoins. This two has been competing since the launch of Cardano but ADA cant handle the competition that much since it needs to surpass other altcoins first before reaching the level of ETH. Good updates can be a big help, I guess ADA should not aim to replace ETH anymore better to focus on its own technology and allows it to stays in the competition.
People are saying Cardano has a good technology, some even say that they are more scalable then eth but where they are basing that statement? Are everyone suddenly tech savvy in that level they can review the code? I am mostly listening to the both sides in this argument and while i am not understanding everything, i feel it's pretty obvious that Charles is overshilling and over simplyfying the problems and his statements on the subject aren't meant for other coders but for shilling ADA to investors. Which is a red flag and pretty much definiton of a populist.
Do you believe that Vitalik is not overshilling and not over simplyfying the problems?
It's true that Vitalik is the most successful in shilling his coin to investors. Obviously, Charles is not as good.
If "populist" is a person, who misleads ordinary people and exploits common misunderstanding and confusion, then Vitalik is a devil in the hell of populism. You have to be a really exceptional person to avoid being a victim of his plausible reasoning.