From what I observe merit is just a way of applauding or publicly appreciating user for a quality thread or comment that meets a demand or a need. The merit is a growth factor that's comes through our comments and posts . And Yes our growth in ranks depends on it but not our growth in knowledge we acquire from the forum about crypto.
Your observation is not wrong. Constructive and quality interactions with this community are appreciated by merits and this system was introduced to give spammers and useless posters a hard time to rank up and to enjoy privileges like reorganization in this community and slot in signature campaign.
You both make a valid point and I wonder why Emitdama said letteredhub because you're actually on the same page. However, getting merit is not always about making a constructive post cause it can be earned through a good contribution that helps others and it also comes through luck at some point because there is a huge constructive post that didn't get any merit.
For you to get merit you to study what you about to discuss on,the topic you are about to reply or contribute to you have to study it and understand what it all about before getting to write on them.
It got no differences from writing constructive posts

. But, being a good poster alone not enough but you need to be a good contributor to this community in some unique way.
Yes, being a good contributor to the community that's focused on by merit sources.