but there seems to be no sign yet that BetFury will continue the signature campaign. on the other hand there is a problem that must be resolved by BetFury to return to make its trusted reputation even better.
somehow for what it must have been maybe I missed something that the BetFury representatives are getting negative trust. it needs to be resolved soon before the signature campaign starts again. because if not, participants are also afraid to join the campaign.
Well negative trust is not going to be solved by signature campaigns. In fact if people see that accusation negative enough they might even give negative trust to people wearing the signature. Like with 1xbit. But i think that would need several unsolved and proven withdraw issues. I don't see Betfury's negative trust such a bad issue it could be. It's just annoying and embarrassing for anyone advertising it.
And there are other ways to advertise this. Just make really good plans with tokenomics and bfg holders will sell this place by themselves as it would be their interest to get way more inflow.
I'm not saying trust can be solved with signature campaigns, but I'm saying if Betfury wants to do another signature campaign, maybe it should solve the problem first, or at least the trust becomes neutral.
so that marketing through signatures is back on and there are new participants knowing that Betfury representatives have no problems regarding trust, they will not hesitate to join the platform.
maybe the red trust in the representative account for us is not a problem, but it would be better if it turned out to be neutral.