I wanted to reply to this topic but at a moment the thread was locked at that moment I realised no matter how much I am in good faith, I was made a criminal for them.
Liar!This thread was not locked, and you were not online for days with this profile.
I also noticed this ridiculous lie -- and also the fact that the scammer acted in good faith. Have you ever thought the opposite?
I really don't understand how some can say such lies in your face when it's crystal clear that whay they say is a lie...
If you are so poor that you don't have 0.1 BTC, I can also accept for you to pay me monthly or weekly in smaller denominations, until you pay the full amount.
Dear dkbit98, I believe you have too high expectations here
Of course the pauper does not have 0.1 BTC. As I explained before,It was funny the way you said but the truth is that while Tate has collection of Lambos inside his garage this pauper is eating the mess from under his fingernails while trying to scam innocent people from the forum.
Imagine his lunch: dirt from four fingernails; dinner: dirt from three more fingernails. On the other side, waiting him to pay on weekly / monthly basis could work, but you know what that would mean, don't you? It would mean for him to scam some more until payment date =)))
You are missing the point that a Shitcoin is mostly harmless and "just" resulting in a loss (by simply holding it).
PI is a fraudulent shitcoin where harm is actively done in multiple ways:
PI is only available for people doing KYC. [...]
PI is a glorified ponzi. [...]
Supporting a fraudulent Shitcoin like PI should be highly discouraged.
PI is a fraudulent shitcoin where harm is actively done in multiple ways:
PI is only available for people doing KYC. [...]
PI is a glorified ponzi. [...]
Supporting a fraudulent Shitcoin like PI should be highly discouraged.
You'd be surprised, but the scammer also supports KYC. According to a post he made inside Romanian board,
KYC va fi extrem de important pentru securitatea financiara in crypto, dar nu inca.
In English, he is saying that "KYC will be extremely important for financial security in crypto, but not yet". Although both I and PrivacyG asked him what he means with this idiocy, he never replied. He replied saying something else, of course, but without answering to our questions.
So what can you expect from someone supporting KYC? To believe anything from your valuable topic Why KYC is extremely dangerous and useless? He won't of course. And, even more bad, he may also make others believe that KYC is safe for them, luring them into traps which they never imagined before.
In addition it's a bit weird that such a flag really gets opposition. It's not a good showing to side with a scammer...
What I find to be more ironic and amusing is that the scammer did not oppose the flag =))) It's like he admits his guilt
Hi, I have saved the whole history and can post it. He wrote to me yesterday that he would like to send me the Bitcoin back, I'll wait, otherwise the whole process will come in here.
Belkin1986, do you have any update on this matter?