I'm not completely sure if this is a plagiarism or not, but this is quite interesting.
So this user create a thread about top 10 AI coins, he have mentioned he took it from Forbes article although he doesn't put the original source (AFAIK it's not plagiarism because he already mention he took from Forbes), the original source is
https://www.forbes.com/uk/advisor/investing/cryptocurrency/top-10-artificial-intelligence-ai-cryptocurrencies/Is it possible that AI currency can change your life? Since the ChatGPT platform has been trending recently, that's why in this topic anyone here will know the top 10 AI crypto coins, this is based on the Forbes Advisor article.
He has already proven that the article was taken from somewhere and does not belong to him in any way by telling us the source of the article in his first sentence. It is not plagiarism; it is simply another poor citation from the OP. from his post history, op is just another copy and paster. Maybe you give him a pM and asked him to cite his work.