the taproot soft fork was pushed too fast, unlikely past soft forks with over 95% of consensus.
Not at all. The time it took for its preparation process was longer than most soft forks and the threshold was also the same as other soft forks.
on layer 1, with the introduction of ordinal,
Just because someone is exploiting the new protocol doesn't mean the whole thing should be removed!
Taproot is already offering a lot of things from the Schnorr signatures (aggregated signatures, faster verification, batch verification, etc.) to all the new things we could do with Taproot.
Not to mention that the solution is very simple too. The same way we have been preventing such garbage data to be pushed to the blockchain, by introducing standard rules that prevent such things!
That also doesn't need any kind of fork.