This is the most ridiculous excuse that I have ever heard regarding the POTUS election. Kamala is unelectable not because of her color or gender. She is unelectable because of her extreme-leftist views. Her gender and color actually helps her in the election, as the opponents are scared of attacking her due to the fear of being branded as racist or patriarchist. The same with Hillary as well. I would rate Hillary as one of the most corrupt politicians in the United States. She couldn't even win the primaries and had resorted to rigging the election in the end, in order to defeat Sanders.
There are female democrats of color, who are electable. I am talking about moderates such as Nikema Williams and Mary Peltola. But these members are considered as too low in the picking order to have a chance at POTUS. And if the Americans were that racist, they would have never elected Barack Obama as the POTUS (and that too two times).
Hillary wasn't extreme leftist, and she was still considered unfit to rule, and Kamala is extreme leftist and she is considered unfit to rule, are we entirely sure this is about their ideas and not about the fact that they are women?
I am pretty sure that no matter who you find, it will always look like there is a reason for them to be unfit to rule. On top of that, Kamala doesn't even have extreme leftist ideas, AOC even doesn't have it, nobody in the USA has "extreme leftist" ideas, the most extreme leftist person in the USA was Bernie Sanders, and he got closer to being elected than any other women that has ever tried before. Hence, we can say that you could be a literal self proclaimed socialist, and if you are a man, you could get close to being elected.