So what's the controvery here, exactly? Is it that Royse777 isn't accepting people into his campaign based on neutral feedbacks from DT members? I just want to make sure I'm following correctly.
In fact, he's doing the exact opposite, accepting members who have neutral feedbacks (which show that they're shitposters) and asking them to have it removed. If he cared so much about their neutral feedback, why did he hire them in the first place?
Ahhh.....that's a different thing entirely, and if that's what he's doing--which I've no reason to doubt after the clarification--then that's just wrong. For one thing, it causes more drama with members trying to get neutral feedback removed, and for another it's squeezing free advertisement out of members who likely will never have a shot at getting paid because they won't be able to get feedback removed.
I really don't understand why he is asking members to beg other members to remove their neutral feedback, it's not the same like negative feedback.
I'd prefer it if Royse777 just didn't accept members with neutral feedback attesting to those members' lack of post quality instead of letting them in contingent on them getting whoever left the feedback to reverse themselves. The chances of that happening are usually small. There can't be
that much of a shortage of applicants, can there?