<cut>
Despite everything, I still think it's highly unfair to have a tag (even though I'm neutral) raising the suspicion that I'm making low-quality posts, just to meet campaign objectives. This doesn't make any sense, when I make more than 70 posts a week. Give my share, I did everything I could. Each draw their own conclusions.
Despite everything, I still think it's highly unfair to have a tag (even though I'm neutral) raising the suspicion that I'm making low-quality posts, just to meet campaign objectives. This doesn't make any sense, when I make more than 70 posts a week. Give my share, I did everything I could. Each draw their own conclusions.
Well, I can see where the "incoherent" part of the neutral tag on your profile is coming from.
I understand that not everyone is proficient in English. However, it's fair to say that some members may find it challenging to read your posts and might struggle to decipher your messages. It's a common side effect of using translation tools like Google Translate. (I don't know if that's actually the case here, but that's what it looks like.)
Keep in mind, while you may be a top-notch poster in your local community, that same level of recognition may not extend to the English section of the forum. If I were you, I'd definitely brush up on my English skills or check out some resources that can help me with better syntax and grammar in my posts.