There is a thing called self-plagiarism. I'm not sure how the forum moderators feel about it, though.
As long as they're not spamming the same content/post in various places
[it's against rule #12], they should be fine:
People obviously shouldn't be banned for sharing their own original articles but it should probably be noted that you originally posted it elsewhere and provide the source.
A few people have their bans removed for numerous reasons. It's not plagiarism if it's your own work and if you can prove that then the ban should be lifted in those cases.
Found another user
[Goria77] that plagiarized @
dkbit98's response to one of my posts
[in the same thread]:
- Copy:
They probably loaded up with microchips when they were available for cheaper prices, and chip shortage is not so severe as it was few months ago or last year,
than they increased device prices a lot after that, so now they can afford to offer bigger discounts.
As much as I appreciate was Trezor has done for hardware wallets and overall Bitcoin industry, I wouldn't buy any of their devices now, even with big discounts.
I would still use them if I receive them for free, but I think there are better options on the market right now.
- Original:
They probably loaded up with microchips when they were available for cheaper prices, and chip shortage is not so severe as it was few months ago or last year,
than they increased device prices a lot after that, so now they can afford to offer bigger discounts.
As much as I appreciate was Trezor has done for hardware wallets and overall Bitcoin industry, I wouldn't buy any of their devices now, even with big discounts.
I would still use them if I receive them for free, but I think there are better options on the market right now.