This question touches on the current political and regulatory landscape surrounding Bitcoin. With the growing adoption of cryptocurrencies, governments and central banks around the world are starting to take notice and consider their stance on this emerging asset class. Some countries are taking a more hands-off approach, while others are implementing regulations and restrictions. The discussion around this topic can lead to interesting perspectives and debates on the future of cryptocurrencies and their interaction with traditional financial systems.
Caae of this nature has been enshrined here before, we all know that government have anything to do with Bitcoin and it's development, because assuming it's easier for government to abolish the existence of cryptocurrency and especially bitcoin, they would have done that before now. So Bitcoin is a supportive function or measure to our different traditional currencies as well. So therefore Bitcoin is a decentralized currency and it have no harm by the government.