Prices began to be duplicated in bitcoin from time to time, and the government launched a virtual wallet, Chivo, which allowed for commission-free transactions. In January, Bukele reported that 60% of the four million population had used the mobile app, and more residents had Chivo than regular bank accounts.
However, a report by the US Bureau of Economic Research shows that of those who installed the app, 80% stopped using it as soon as they spent the $30 bonus. And most of those who continue to use Chivo pay with dollars. At the same time, less than 65% of the country is covered by mobile internet.
One of the hopes pinned on bitcoin was to save hundreds of millions of dollars in money transfer fees. The money sent home by migrant workers accounts for more than 20% of El Salvador's GDP. For some households, this is the main source of income. Conventional services charge a 10% commission, and people are sometimes forced to wait for days to make a transfer.
However, as a result, only 1.6% of these transfers are made through digital wallets. A Deutsche Bank study found that people prefer to exchange bitcoins for dollars, which is not so easy to do. They often turn to unofficial money changers who set their own fees.
You cite a variety of specific pieces of information. Did you create this information yourself or do you have a source (or sources) for your pieces of information?
What about US Bureau of Economic Research.. Do you have a link? Is that your only source? Is the Deutsche Bank study a different source or does it come from your same source? Why not cite your source(s) especially when you are getting into those kinds of specifics? Do you have any personal opinion about this information that you are sharing? Did you write your own post, or did you lift your text from somewhere else?