Especially, since campaign managers check every post, supposedly. I kind of wish they reported the one's they think aren't up to standard.
This actually kind of sparked an idea.. What about a script that monitors the posts of signature campaign participants (or all Bitcointalk accounts, for that matter) and immediately throws them into some sort of AI which has been trained with labeled datasets of shitposts and good posts.
If a post matches the 'shitpost' category with some high probability, it is going to be logged on a webpage. Whoever wants to, can browse through there and quickly report posts - maybe with a checkbox-type user interface. You could then even easily mark a whole set of e.g. 100 posts and only uncheck the ones that the AI mistakenly flagged.
Bonus points if this software only shows the content, no usernames and avatars or signatures. Judge purely based on post quality.