Well, I believe that if there be any need for an upgrade and the time is should happen, the team know and will take that action when the time is right for them to, currently, like you said, they must be working really hard currently on many things, to make sure the casino itself is running smoothly, you can agree with me that without the casino, there will be no BFG token..
So let's allow them do their thing.
There is a need for adequate policy analysis before implementation, and just as you have rightly stated no team jumps on any suggestion without adequate consultation before implementation no matter how crucial that is to the development of the casino.
BFG token was one such initiatives of the casino to diversify its resources, even though that project has not recorded any level of success compared to its sister agency which is the casino itself.
And it may still take a very long time before, this token can pick in market value, but the casino on the other side should limit the amount of total supply
You are absolutely correct, and I think that one of the major downside to casino tokens is that they usually lack use case, and that is why their value will either take a very long time to appreciate to a very noticeable amount, or might never increase at all.
Aside offering token holders the possibility to stake their token for dividends of commission, there is nothing else I see the token can be used for, even the ability to stake and earn profit isn't even a usecase, and speculative tokens without a huge community hardly give good profit to its holders, but anyways, let's see how BFG would perform in the coming year.